Wednesday, December 10th, 2008

Jesus’ Resurrection: Fact or Fiction

Jesus' Resurrection: Fact or Fiction
Presenter: Rev’d Clinton Chisholm

Part A

TWELVE KNOWN HISTORICAL FACTS CONCERNING THE RESURRECTION EVENT

(Gary Habermas, The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence For the Life of Christ, College Press, 1996)

  1. Jesus died by crucifixion (Mt. 27.50; Mk.15.37, 44-45; Lk. 23.46; Jn.19.30, 33-34)Josephus (Antiquities 18.3)[1] ‘Pilate condemned him to be crucified and to die…’Tacitus (Annals 15.44)[2] ‘…Christus….suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of…Pontius Pilate…’Talmud (Sanhedrin 43a)[3] ‘On the eve of the Passover Yeshu was hanged…’ [=put up on a cross, cf. Lk. 23.39; Gal. 3.13]
  2. Jesus was buried (Mt. 27.59-60; Mk. 15.43,46; Lk. 23.52-53; Jn. 19.40-42)
  3. Jesus’ death caused his disciples to despair and lose hope, believing that his life was ended (Mt. 28.17; Mk. 16.11;Lk. 24.11, 21)
  4. The tomb was discovered to be empty just a few days later (Mt. 28.6-7; Mk. 16.5-6; Lk. 24.3,12; Jn. 20.6-Nazareth Decree[4] , believed to be issued by Claudius. ‘It is my pleasure that graves and tombs remain perpetually undisturbed…If, however, anyone charges that another has either demolished them, or has in any other way extracted the buried…or has displaced the sealing on other stones…In case of violation I desire that the offender be sentenced to capital punishment…’
  5. The disciples had experiences which they believed were literal appearances of the risen Jesus (Mt. 28.9-10, 16-18; Mk. 16.9, 13-14; Lk. 24.30-31; Jn. 20.[14, 16], 19-20, 25, 27, 21.1, 14; Acts 1.3, 9-10; 1 Cor. 9.1, 15. 3-8/Acts 9.1-9, 22.5-11, 26.12-18)
  6. Because of these appearances the once doubting disciples became bold proclaimers of Jesus’ death and resurrection (Acts 1.22; 2.22-24, 32; 3.15; 4.2, 10, 13; 17.18, 31, etc.)
  7. This resurrection message was the center of preaching in the early church (Acts 1.22; 2.22-24, 32; 3.15; 4.2, 10, 13; 17.18, 31, etc.)
  8. This resurrection message was especially proclaimed in Jerusalem, where Jesus died and was buried shortly before (Acts 1-8)Tacitus (Annals 15.44) ‘…a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea…but even in Rome…’Suetonius (Nero, 16) ‘After the great fire at Rome…Punishments were also inflicted on the Christians, a sect professing a new and mischievous religious belief.’
  9. As a result of the resurrection message the church was born and grew in Jerusalem   (Acts 2.5, 41, 47; 8.1, etc.)
  10. Sunday became the primary day of worship for the growing church (Sunday being ‘resurrection day’ and the day on which Jesus made some post-mortem appearances, and as well the day on which the Church was born, Jn. 20. 26; Lev. 23.15-16/Acts 2.1ff; 20.6-7; 1 Cor. 16.1-2)Pliny the Younger (Letters 10.96)[5] ‘[the Christians] were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang…a hymn to Christ, as to a god…’
  11.  James (Jesus’ brother), who had been a skeptic, was converted to the faith when he also believed he saw the resurrected Jesus (Mk. 3.31-35; Jn. 7.5; 1 Cor. 15.7)
  12. A few years later, the Christian-persecuting Paul was converted by an experience which he believed to be an appearance of the resurrected Jesus (Acts 9.3-6; 22.6-10; 26.12-18; 1 Cor. 15.8)

Any theory which seeks to counter or compete with the resurrection must deal with and fit these twelve facts.

Part B

When did Jesus die and when was he resurrected?

Preamble: Groups like the Church of God International, the Church of God (7th day), The Assembly of Yahweh hold that the crucifixion was on Wednesday and the resurrection on Saturday because three days and three nights require 72 hours of entombment.[7]

The Arguments for a Wednesday Crucifixion

“For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly, so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.”

    •  Christ’s entombment (time in the grave) would be “…a full three days and three nights which is equal to 72 hours.”
    •  ‘Days’ and ‘nights’ are not idiomatic but literal time frames.

“And it was the preparation of the Passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, ‘Behold your King’.”

“The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the Sabbath day, (for that Sabbath day was an high day) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken and that they might be taken away.”

    •  ‘Preparation’ was not the day before the 7th day Sabbath but the day before the annual Passover Sabbath, which in that year, it is alleged, occurred on a Thursday.  ‘Preparation’ then, was on Wednesday.
    •  John, wishing to differentiate the Passover Sabbath from the 7th day Sabbath, calls it a ‘high day’.

Responses to the Argument for a Wednesday Crucifixion

  • The main point of the ‘sign of Jonah’ (Mt. 12.40) is not a literal 72-hour entombment but the miracle of deliverance.
    • In the same gospel of Matthew (16.4), the ‘sign of Jonah’ is mentioned but without any time reference.  The same is true in Luke 11.29-32, where Jonah and Christ themselves are regarded as signs or marvels designed to convince, because both were participants in starkly miraculous events of deliverance.

 

“Jonah was a sign to the Ninevites, because he appeared there as one sent by God after having been miraculously saved from the great fish (as it were raised from the dead) as a proof that he was really sent by God.  So also Jesus will by His resurrection prove conclusively that He has been sent by God as the Christ, the Messiah, the promised Redeemer.” (Norval Geldenhuys, The New Testament Commentary (Luke), 334)

    • In John 2.19, the Jews request a sign and Jesus replied, “Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up.”  As in Matthew 12.40 a sign is requested and given-the resurrection.
    •  “It is important to note that in biblical times a fraction of a day or of a night was reckoned inclusively as representing the whole day or night.  This method of reckoning is known as ‘inclusive reckoning’.”  (Samuele Bacchiocchi, The Time of the Crucifixion and the Resurrection, 23)
      • ‘A day and a night’ then in Biblical and rabbinical literature refers “not to an exact number of hours or of minutes but simply to a calendrical day, whether complete or incomplete.” (Bacchiocchi, cited above, 22)
      • In Esther 4.16, we have an example of ‘inclusive reckoning’.  Esther declares, “…fast ye for me and neither eat nor drink three days, night or day: I also and my maidens will fast likewise: then will I go in unto the King.

In Esther 5.1, Esther went in unto the King ‘on the third day’.  If thethree days and three nights’ fast was intended to be a literal 72-hour fast, Esther would have to go in unto the King ‘on the fourth day’.

      • In 1 Samuel 30.12 the abandoned Egyptian is said to have had nothing ‘for three days and three nights’ yet in v.13 he declares that he had been left behind ‘three days ago’.  If the ‘three days and three nights’ were intended to be a literal 72-hour period, the servant would have had to say he was abandoned ‘four days ago’.
      • Rabbi Eleazar ben Azariah, who lived about AD 100, stated, “A day and a night are an Onah (‘a portion of time’) and the portion of an Onah is as the whole of it.” (Jerusalem Talmud, Shabbath 9, 3)
  • Close examination of the ‘three days’ passages pertaining to the resurrection of Jesus confirms the biblical method of inclusive reckoning.  The same statements of our Lord which in Mark’s gospel contain the phrase ‘after three days’ are reported in Matthew and Luke with the phrase ‘on the third day’ showing sameness in meaning.

Mark 8.31 =Matthew 16.21   =Luke 9.22

‘after three days’ ‘on the third day’   ‘on the third day’

Mark 9.31 =Matthew 17.23

‘after three days’ ‘on the third day’

Mark 10.34 =Matthew 20.19   =Luke 18.33

‘after three days’ ‘on the third day’   ‘on the third day’

  • The crucial verse that demolishes the arguments for a Wednesday crucifixion and Saturday resurrection is Luke 24:21.
    •  It is the first day of the week (Luke 24:1, 13), two of Jesus’ disciples are   discussing the events of the past days and Jesus joins the conversation/asks them about their discussion. They began to explain to him that Jesus of Nazareth was crucified, and in disappointment they said, v. 21, “we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this TODAY IS THE THIRD DAY SINCE THESE THINGS WERE DONE.”
    •   The third day then was Sunday, the first day of the week, and as Luke 24:29 hints, the statement in Luke 24:21 was made sometime ‘toward evening’ when the first day was ‘far spent’. We again quote the seventh day Adventist scholar, Samuele Bacchiocchi, “It is obvious, then that if Christ had been crucified on a Wednesday afternoon, those two disciples could not have referred to that event on a Sunday night, saying; ‘it is now the third day since this happened.’ According to the Jewish inclusive day-reckoning it would have been the fifth day and not the third.” (p.28)

 

  • The sequence of the Passion weekend are clearly described in the Gospels as Preparation day (crucifixion/entombment), Sabbath (entombment), First Day (Resurrection)
    • Mark 15:42 shows that Jesus was crucified the day of ‘preparation’, that is, the day before the Sabbath. The next day for Mark is the Sabbath (Mark 16:1), followed by the ‘first day of the week’ (Mark 16:2)
    • Luke 23:54 says the same, Jesus was crucified and entombed ‘that day (which) was the preparation, and the Sabbath drew on.’ After the Sabbath came the first day of the week (Luke 23:56 and 24:1)
    • By linking the beginning of the Sabbath to the end of the preparation,  and the beginning of the ‘first day of the week’ to the termination of the Sabbath both Mark and Luke LEAVE ABSOLUTELY NO ROOM FOR TWO FULL DAYS TO INTERVENE BETWEEN THE CRUCIFIXION AND THE RESURRECTION.
  • In John 19.31 we read, “…that Sabbath was a high day” not “…that was a high Sabbath“, and in 19.14 we read, “And it was the preparation of the Passover”.
    • Both passages affirm that the Friday was the Friday of the Passover week and that weekly Sabbath was a high day because it fell in Passover week.
  • “The Sabbath about to open was a ‘high-day’-it was both a Sabbath and the second Paschal Day, which was regarded as in every respect equally sacred with the first, nay more so, since the so-called wavesheaf was then offered to the Lord.” (Alfred Edersheim, The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah, 613)

 

  • Matthew 28.1 seems to contain a contradiction as it is normally translated in the King James Version, because ‘in the end of the Sabbath’ is not ‘as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week’.  The troublesome word in Greek is opse, translated in the KJV as ‘in the end’.  The word can mean ‘in the end’, ‘long after’ or ‘after’.
    • By virtue of the companion passages dealing with the visit of the women to the tomb (Mark 16.1-2, “when the Sabbath was past…at the rising of the sun“; Luke 24.1, “very early in the morning“) and the Jewish restrictions re Sabbath travel, the meaning of opse must be ‘after’ or ‘long after’.
    • Even though the Greek word translated ‘to dawn’ in Matthew 28.1 has a figurative sense of ‘drawing close’ its literal meaning is ‘to grow light’, ‘to shine forth’ or ‘to dawn’, pointing to the early morning of a day.
    • The traditional reading of Matthew 28.1 then would be “after the Sabbath, as the first day of the week was dawning”.
    • Another legitimate proposal made by Ralph Woodrow[8] -which I prefer-is to see the time reference that normally begins Mt. 28.1 as really belonging to the time of the posting of the guard in Mt. 27.66.  So the reading would be, “So they went and made the tomb secure, sealing the stone and setting the guard in the end of the Sabbath.”

Conclusion

  • The testimony of the early Christian writers (after the Apostles) reveals unanimous acceptance of a Friday crucifixion, Sunday resurrection.  No early Christian writer ever disputed or doubted this sequence.
  • The Biblical record, properly understood in its historical context, clearly affirms a Friday crucifixion and a Sunday resurrection

Resources

Clinton Chisholm, The Resurrection of Jesus: Saturday or Sunday, Fact or Fiction? Cassette.

Clinton Chisholm, The Historicity of the Resurrection (featuring William Lane Craig), CD.

Gary Habermas & Michael Licona, The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ, 2004.

©Rev’d Clinton Chisholm, August 25, 2004

 

1. Written between AD 90 and 95.  After AD 70 he became court historian for Emperor Vespasian.

2. Written c. AD 115.

3. Written c. AD 115.  Suetonius was chief secretary of Emperor Hadrian (AD 117-138).

4. Discovered in 1878 at Nazareth, written in Greek, as an ordinance of Caesar.

5. Written c. AD 115.  Suetonius was chief secretary of Emperor Hadrian (AD 117-138).

6. Written c. 107.  Pliny was governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor (modern Turkey).

7. Dr. Frederick Pryce (seen on TBN, Thursday, April 24, 2003) holds a similar view with one modification; Jesus completed the 72 hours up to 6.00 pm on Saturday evening and rose on Sunday but not early Sunday morning as most Churches believe.  He re-punctuates Mk. 16.9 to read, “Now when Jesus rose, early on the first day of the week he appeared first to Mary Magdalene…”  For Pryce Jesus rose sometime between 6.01 pm on the Saturday and the time when he appeared to Mary Magdalene on the Sunday morning.”

8. “Three Days & Three Nights”-Reconsidered in Light of Scripture, 1993, 21-23.

 

 


Category: Blog
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

  • INSPIKS Gravatar [Get a Gravatar !]